Nature versus Nurture. Phonics versus Whole Language. Reductionist versus Constructivist. Traditional versus Progressive. Once the conversation begins lines are quickly drawn and, as educators, we either withdraw or begin to espouse our current position. We have heard it all before. Parents and others in the public take sides as well, taking their cue from their own experience or from someone they believe and respect. Meanwhile, politicians use whichever position they believe will further their own agenda, whether in the best interest of children or not. After all, who are they to believe?
Over a period of several decades the author both witnessed and participated in the arguments listed above. Finally, after realizing the same issues recycled every 20-25 years, he began to search for areas of agreement in the work of brain researchers and other cognitive scientists to see if there is a body of agreed-upon evidence to support or refute the various claims. The search resulted in a list of eight promising candidates for the basic theorems of learning. The listing was reported out at the Learning and the Brain Conference at Harvard and MIT in May of 1999 and is included here for your consideration and comment. It is not assumed that the list is all-inclusive. It may contain redundancies and may contain items all researchers would not agree upon. It is intended as a starting point in an effort to limit energy-wasting arguments over particular teaching techniques, instructional strategies and curriculum designs. All this said, here are the eight candidates:
Genetics
At birth, our brain is made up of tens of millions of basic neural networks, each programmed through natural selection to process a specific element of the environment.
Stage Development
The growing brain is especially well equipped for particular kinds of learning at certain stages of development.
Mental Models
Infants form mental models about how the world works and, as they receive new information from the environment, they modify their theories to better explain to themselves what they are hearing, seeing, and feeling.
Emotion
Emotion plays a central role in cognition both by driving attention and by aiding in memory storage. High challenge and personal meaning enhance learning, threat inhibits learning.
Handling Crisis vs. Slow Developing Problems
The brain is better at sizing up and responding to high contrast, sudden changes than in monitoring slowly evolving, subtle changes.
Brain Plasticity and the Role of Experience
Brains are self-organizing, making connections and allocating space in response to each individual’s experience and perceptions. They are capable of growth throughout life. Learning is a reflective activity that allows us to draw upon past experiences to create meaning, formulate deeper understanding, and shape our futures. Knowing depends on engagement in practice.
The Social Nature of Learning
Learning is essentially a social, collaborative, problem-solving activity.
Adequate Time
Adequate time is needed for assimilation and integration of new knowledge.
If you would like to enter into a dialogue with the author regarding the proposed theorems or their use in planning educational programs, he can be reached by email at: rvaliant@clearwire.net
****


I would like to challenge Kennewick teachers to write brief vignettes of the practices being used to raise test scores and show how they match up to the 8 brain principles listed in the article. For example, describe a scripted reading lesson and tell which, if any, principles support this technique.